Line 242: |
Line 242: |
| \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0;\mathbf{p_f}, \epsilon_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \epsilon_i\rangle | | \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0;\mathbf{p_f}, \epsilon_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \epsilon_i\rangle |
| </math> | | </math> |
− | Parity conservation requires that <math>\epsilon_X=\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R</math> and <math>\epsilon_R=\epsilon_i\epsilon_f</math>. The last two matrix elements in the expression above for <math>T_{fi}</math> not known ''a priori'', so we combine them into a single factor that expresses the net amplitude for producing resonance ''X'' in the given state from the given initial state. | + | Parity conservation requires that <math>\epsilon_X=\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R</math> and <math>\epsilon_R=\epsilon_i\epsilon_f</math>. The last two matrix elements in the expression above for <math>T_{fi}</math> not known ''a priori'', so we parameterized them into a pair of unknown functions ''v(s,t)'' and ''w(s,t)''. |
| :<math>\displaystyle | | :<math>\displaystyle |
− | f^{X,M_X,\epsilon_X}_{R,\lambda_R,\epsilon_R;\epsilon_i,\epsilon_f}(s,t) =
| + | v^{X,M_X,\epsilon_X}_{\lambda_R,\epsilon_R}(s,t) = |
| \langle J_X M_X \epsilon_X | V | | | \langle J_X M_X \epsilon_X | V | |
| \epsilon_\gamma; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0\rangle | | \epsilon_\gamma; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0\rangle |
| </math> | | </math> |
− | :::::::::<math>\times
| + | :<math>\displaystyle |
| + | w_{\epsilon_R;\epsilon_i} = |
| \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0;\mathbf{p_f}, \epsilon_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \epsilon_i\rangle | | \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0;\mathbf{p_f}, \epsilon_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \epsilon_i\rangle |
| </math> | | </math> |