Line 194: |
Line 194: |
| \left(\frac{q_\pi dm_\rho}{16\pi^3}\right) | | \left(\frac{q_\pi dm_\rho}{16\pi^3}\right) |
| </math> | | </math> |
− | where <math>p_i\,</math> [<math>p_f\,</math>] is the target [recoil] nucleon momentum in the center of mass frame of the overall reaction. The explicit kinematic factors from the initial-state flux and the density of final states for each of the decays are not factored into the T matrix so that we can make sure that it explicitly respects unitarity in each partial wave. In terms of the individual decay matrix elements introduced earlier, the T matrix element can be written as | + | where <math>p_i\,</math> [<math>p_f\,</math>] is the target [recoil] nucleon momentum in the center of mass frame of the overall reaction. In terms of the individual decay matrix elements introduced earlier, the T matrix element can be written as |
| | | |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| T_{(f)(i)} = | | T_{(f)(i)} = |
− | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \mathbf{p}_f \lambda_f) | + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \mathbf{p}_f \epsilon_f) |
− | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \mathbf{p}_i \lambda_i)}= | + | (\mathbf{k}_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma \mathbf{p}_i \epsilon_i)}= |
| </math> | | </math> |
− | ::::<math>
| + | :::<math> |
| =\sum_{R,\lambda_R;\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | | =\sum_{R,\lambda_R;\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} |
| \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b1}\lambda_{b1} 0 | | \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b1}\lambda_{b1} 0 |
Line 207: |
Line 207: |
| </math> | | </math> |
| :::::::::<math> \times | | :::::::::<math> \times |
− | \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R;s,t; \mathbf{p_f}, \lambda_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \lambda_i\rangle | + | \langle J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R;s,t; \mathbf{p_f}, \epsilon_f | W | \mathbf{p_i}, \epsilon_i\rangle |
| </math> | | </math> |
| + | |
| + | To obtain the second line in the above equation, we factorized the T operator into two vertex factors U and W, and inserted between them a sum over a complete set of intermediate exchanges ''R''. Polarizations of all particles are represented by the reflectivity quantum numbers <math>\epsilon</math>. For the nucleon, the reflectivity is a complete description of its spin state. For reactions involving higher spin baryons, it would need to be supplemented by an additional <math>|m|</math> quantum number. |
| + | |
| + | |
| | | |
| === Proton states and individual decay amplitudes === | | === Proton states and individual decay amplitudes === |
Line 216: |
Line 220: |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| \frac{d^8\sigma}{d\Omega_{b1}\,d\Omega_\omega\,d\Omega_\rho\,d\Omega_\pi} \propto | | \frac{d^8\sigma}{d\Omega_{b1}\,d\Omega_\omega\,d\Omega_\rho\,d\Omega_\pi} \propto |
− | \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\lambda_i \lambda_f \lambda_i' \lambda_f'} | + | \sum_{\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma' \epsilon_i \epsilon_f \epsilon_i' \epsilon_f'} |
− | \rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'} | + | \rho_{\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma'} |
− | \rho_{\lambda_f \lambda_f'} | + | \rho_{\epsilon_i \epsilon_i'} |
− | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \lambda_f) | + | \delta_{\epsilon_f \epsilon_f'} |
− | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \lambda_i)} | + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \mathbf{p}_f \epsilon_f) |
− | T^*_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \lambda_f') | + | (\mathbf{k}_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma \mathbf{p}_i \epsilon_i)} |
− | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \lambda_i')} | + | T^*_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \mathbf{p}_f \epsilon_f') |
| + | (\mathbf{k}_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma' \mathbf{p}_i \epsilon_i')} |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
− | where density matrices <math>\rho</math> represent weights of proton's states in the summations. The unpolarized target presents an initial state with both helicities equally likely, resulting in | + | where density matrices <math>\rho</math> represent the initial state particles' spin states. The unpolarized target presents an initial state with both reflectivities equally likely, resulting in |
− | <math>\rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'} \propto \rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'}</math>. The same property holds for <math>\rho_{\lambda_f \lambda_f'}</math> by definition of the summation over the final states. As a result, the term characterizing the target proton's transition with the emission of the Reggeon factorizes, allowing us to drop indices for the proton states in the T matrix: | + | <math>\rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'} = \frac{1}{2} \delta_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'}</math>. The same property holds for <math>\rho_{\lambda_f \lambda_f'}</math> by definition of the summation over the final states. As a result, the term characterizing the target proton's transition with the emission of the Reggeon factorizes, allowing us to drop indices for the proton states in the T matrix: |
| | | |
| :<math> | | :<math> |