Line 196: |
Line 196: |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| T_{(f)(i)} = | | T_{(f)(i)} = |
− | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1}) | + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \lambda_f) |
− | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t)}= | + | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \lambda_i)}= |
| </math> | | </math> |
| ::::<math> | | ::::<math> |
Line 208: |
Line 208: |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
− | The aggregate decay matrix element can be further broken up into a product of individual decay amplitudes, | + | An average over the target proton initial state will be necessary to compute the cross section section. Also, because the polarization of the recoiling proton cannot be measured, a sum over the proton final states must be done. This can be represented as |
| + | |
| + | :<math> |
| + | \frac{d^8\sigma}{d\Omega_{b1}\,d\Omega_\omega\,d\Omega_\rho\,d\Omega_\pi} \propto |
| + | \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\lambda_i \lambda_f \lambda_i' \lambda_f'} |
| + | \rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'} |
| + | \rho_{\lambda_f \lambda_f'} |
| + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \lambda_f) |
| + | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \lambda_i)} |
| + | T^*_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \lambda_f') |
| + | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t \lambda_i')} |
| + | </math> |
| + | |
| + | where density matrices <math>\rho</math> represent weights of proton's states in the summations. The unpolarized target presents an initial state with both helicities equally likely, resulting in |
| + | <math>\rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'} \propto \rho_{\lambda_i \lambda_i'}</math>. The same property holds for <math>\rho_{\lambda_f \lambda_f'}</math> by definition of the summation over the final states. As a result, the term characterizing the target proton's transition with the emission of the Reggeon factorizes, allowing us to drop indices for the proton states in the T matrix: |
| + | |
| + | :<math> |
| + | T_{(f)(i)} = |
| + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1}) |
| + | (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R t)} |
| + | </math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | The remaining production and decay matrix elements can be further broken up into a product of individual decay amplitudes, |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b1}\lambda_{b1} 0 | | \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b1}\lambda_{b1} 0 |
Line 267: |
Line 290: |
| === Summing over polarizations === | | === Summing over polarizations === |
| | | |
− | The T Matrix, written in the photon reflectivity basis can be expanded in the photon's lab frame helicity basis | + | The T Matrix, written in the photon reflectivity basis can be expanded in the photon's lab frame helicity basis. Temporarily omitting indices not pertaining to the photon: |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| T_{\epsilon_\gamma} = \frac{\sqrt{-\epsilon_\gamma}}{2} | | T_{\epsilon_\gamma} = \frac{\sqrt{-\epsilon_\gamma}}{2} |
Line 295: |
Line 318: |
| :::<math> | | :::<math> |
| =\frac{|T_{-1}|^2 + |T_{+1}|^2}{2} + | | =\frac{|T_{-1}|^2 + |T_{+1}|^2}{2} + |
− | g\left[\mathrm{Re}(T_{+1}T_{-1}^*)\cos 2\alpha + | + | g\,\mathrm{Re}(T_{+1}T_{-1}^*)e^{2i\alpha} |
− | \mathrm{Im}(T_{+1}T_{-1}^*)\sin 2\alpha)\right]
| |
| </math> | | </math> |
| where ''g'' is the polarization fraction ranging from 1 (100% x-polarized) to 0 (unpolarized.) | | where ''g'' is the polarization fraction ranging from 1 (100% x-polarized) to 0 (unpolarized.) |