Line 189: |
Line 189: |
| == Assembly of the full amplitude == | | == Assembly of the full amplitude == |
| | | |
− | Putting together the amplitudes discussed above, we arrive at the complete amplitude of photo-production of resonance X and decay to the given final state. | + | Putting together the amplitudes discussed above, we arrive at the complete angular-dependent amplitude of photo-production of resonance X and decay to the given final state. The mass-dependent component of the amplitude is given by the Breit-Wigner form: |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
− | \sum_{L_X} A_{L_X \epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R}^{J_X}= | + | BW_L(m)=\frac{m_0 \Gamma_L(m)}{m_0^2-m^2-im_0\Gamma_L(m)} |
| + | </math> |
| + | where, |
| + | :<math> |
| + | \Gamma_L(m)=\Gamma_0 \frac{m_0}{m} \frac{q}{q_0} \frac{F_L(q)}{F_L(q_0)} |
| + | </math> |
| + | where ''q'' is the breakup momentum of the daughter particles and ''q<sub>0</sub>'' is the same, evaluated at ''m<sub>0</sub>''. |
| + | |
| + | The total expression becomes: |
| + | |
| + | :<math> |
| + | \sum_{L_X \epsilon_R} A_{L_X \epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R}^{J_X}= |
| \sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | | \sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} |
| \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U_X | | | \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U_X | |
Line 207: |
Line 218: |
| \epsilon_\gamma e^{i\alpha}\left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right) ; | | \epsilon_\gamma e^{i\alpha}\left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right) ; |
| J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle | | J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle |
| + | </math> |
| + | ::<math> |
| + | BW_{L_X}^X BW_{L_{b_1}}^{b_1} BW_{L_\omega}^\rho BW_{L_\rho}^\rho |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
− | Note that we leave the sum over <math>L_X</math> outside the amplitude of interest. This is convenient in partial wave analysis so that the hypothesized L-states can be listed and summed explicitly. | + | Note that we leave the sum over <math>L_X</math> outside the amplitude of interest. This is convenient in partial wave analysis so that the hypothesized L-states can be listed and summed explicitly. In mass-independent fits, the Breit-Wigner for the resonance is replaced with strength factors that are parameters of the fit. |
| | | |
| The intensity would then require an incoherent summation of amplitudes with laboratory x and y polarization. | | The intensity would then require an incoherent summation of amplitudes with laboratory x and y polarization. |
| :<math>I= | | :<math>I= |
− | \frac{1+f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X} A_{L_X\;-1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 + | + | \frac{1+f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X \epsilon_R} A_{L_X\;-1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 + |
− | \frac{1-f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X} A_{L_X\;+1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 | + | \frac{1-f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X \epsilon_R} A_{L_X\;+1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
| where f is the polarization fraction varying from 1, 100% x-polarized, to 0, unpolarized. | | where f is the polarization fraction varying from 1, 100% x-polarized, to 0, unpolarized. |