Line 78: |
Line 78: |
| | | |
| Consider the t-channel production of a resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, consisting of plane-wave states constructed to be eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. This turns out in the case of the photon to correspond to the usual linear polarization basis |x> and |y>. Let the x (y) linear polarization states be denoted as ε=- (ε=+). | | Consider the t-channel production of a resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, consisting of plane-wave states constructed to be eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. This turns out in the case of the photon to correspond to the usual linear polarization basis |x> and |y>. Let the x (y) linear polarization states be denoted as ε=- (ε=+). |
− | :<math>|\varepsilon\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{-\varepsilon}{2}} \left( \left|1\; -1\right\rangle +\varepsilon \left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right)</math> | + | :<math>|\epsilon\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{-\epsilon}{2}} \left( \left|1\; -1\right\rangle +\epsilon \left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right)</math> |
| | | |
− | :<math>\mathbb{R}|\varepsilon\rangle = \varepsilon |\varepsilon\rangle </math> | + | :<math>\mathbb{R}|\epsilon\rangle = \epsilon |\epsilon\rangle </math> |
| | | |
| The strong interaction Hamiltonian respects reflectivity, so the production operator ''V'' should commute with ''R''. | | The strong interaction Hamiltonian respects reflectivity, so the production operator ''V'' should commute with ''R''. |
Line 112: |
Line 112: |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
− | where <math>\alpha=-\phi</math> - the rotation angle to return from production plane to lab xz plane. | + | where <math>\alpha=-\phi</math>: the rotation angle to return from production plane to lab xz plane. Thus, the production amplitude becomes: |
| + | |
| + | :<math> |
| + | \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |
| + | \langle J_X m_X (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R)|V| |
| + | \sqrt{-\epsilon} \left( e^{-i\alpha}\left|1\; -1\right\rangle + |
| + | \epsilon e^{i\alpha}\left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right) ; |
| + | J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle |
| + | </math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| | | |
| == Decay of t-channel resonance X== | | == Decay of t-channel resonance X== |
Line 170: |
Line 180: |
| </math> | | </math> |
| | | |
| + | |
| + | == Assembly of the full amplitude == |
| | | |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
Line 183: |
Line 195: |
| </math> | | </math> |
| ::<math> | | ::<math> |
| + | \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |
| \langle J_X m_X (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R)|V| | | \langle J_X m_X (\epsilon_\gamma \epsilon_R)|V| |
− | \epsilon_\gamma ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle | + | \sqrt{-\epsilon_\gamma} \left( e^{-i\alpha}\left|1\; -1\right\rangle + |
| + | \epsilon_\gamma e^{i\alpha}\left|1\; +1\right\rangle \right) ; |
| + | J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle |
| + | </math> |
| + | |
| + | The intensity would then require an incoherent summation of amplitudes with laboratory x and y polarization. |
| + | :<math> |
| + | \frac{1+f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X} A_{L_X\;-1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 + |
| + | \frac{1-f}{2}\left|\sum_{L_X} A_{L_X\;+1\;\epsilon_R}^{J_X}\right|^2 |
| </math> | | </math> |
| + | |
| + | where f is the polarization fraction varying from 1, 100% x-polarized, to 0, unpolarized. |