Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 198: Line 198:  
Calculation of g proves more challenging. We know the wave equation
 
Calculation of g proves more challenging. We know the wave equation
   −
<math>\frac{d^2y}{dt^2} - \frac{c^2d^2y}{dx^2} = 0</math>
+
<math>\frac{d^2y}{dt^2} - c^2\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = 0</math>
    
However, this is for a uniform, sourceless wave. Like most generalizations, this is an unrealistic situation in the real world. What we need is a function that can generate a brief pulse. This sounds like a delta function.
 
However, this is for a uniform, sourceless wave. Like most generalizations, this is an unrealistic situation in the real world. What we need is a function that can generate a brief pulse. This sounds like a delta function.
   −
<math>\frac{d^2g}{dt^2} - \frac{c^2d^2g}{dx^2} = \delta(\Delta \mathbf{x})\delta(\Delta t)</math>
+
<math>\frac{d^2g}{dt^2} - c^2\frac{d^2g}{dx^2} = \delta^3(\Delta \mathbf{x})\delta(\Delta t)</math>
    
This is not an easy equation to solve without using a Fourier transform. Therefore, we'll do just that, with G as the transformed function.
 
This is not an easy equation to solve without using a Fourier transform. Therefore, we'll do just that, with G as the transformed function.
135

edits

Navigation menu