Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| The combined wave equation is unimportant, since we only record its amplitude, which is | | The combined wave equation is unimportant, since we only record its amplitude, which is |
| | | |
− | <math>A^2 _{total} = C _1 A^2 + C _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 A^2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math> | + | <math>A^2 _{12} = C _1 A^2 + C _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 A^2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math> |
| | | |
− | <math>A^2 _{total} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math> | + | <math>A^2 _{12} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math> |
| | | |
| Because the wave reflecting off the back of the diamond travels through the diamond twice, the term <math> d _2 - d _1 </math> is twice the thickness of the diamond, in seconds. Because this measurement is in unhelpful units, we can multiply it by the speed of light in a diamond and divide by two for the thickness <math> \tau </math>. | | Because the wave reflecting off the back of the diamond travels through the diamond twice, the term <math> d _2 - d _1 </math> is twice the thickness of the diamond, in seconds. Because this measurement is in unhelpful units, we can multiply it by the speed of light in a diamond and divide by two for the thickness <math> \tau </math>. |
Line 45: |
Line 45: |
| Therefore, we can rewrite the earlier equation in terms of <math> \tau </math>: | | Therefore, we can rewrite the earlier equation in terms of <math> \tau </math>: |
| | | |
− | <math>A^2 _{total} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( 2 \tau / V _d ) </math> | + | <math>A^2 _{12} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( 2 \tau / V _d ) </math> |
| | | |
| == Calculating the Shape == | | == Calculating the Shape == |
| | | |
− | Of course, thickness is not the only thing we need. We will also detect a third laser, which reflects off the mirror. We can calculate that the amplitude of this new combined wave will be | + | Of course, thickness is not the only thing we need. After calculating <math> \tau </math> and uncovering the mirror, we will also detect the third laser reflection. We can calculate that the amplitude of this new combined wave will be |
| | | |
− | <math>A^2 _{recieved} = A^2 + A^2 _t + 2 A A _t \cos ( d _t ) </math> | + | <math>A^2 _{123} = A^2 + C^2 _1 A^2 + C^2 _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) + 2 C _1 \cos ( - d _1 ) + 2 C _2 \cos ( - d _2 ) </math> |
| | | |
− | Because we have values for A and <math> A _t </math>, we can almost find <math>A _{recieved} </math>. Unfortunately, we lack values for the new phase-shift term, which is a function of the phase-shifts of <math> \Psi _1 </math> and <math> \Psi _2 </math>. This can be easily expressed as
| + | |
| | | |
− | <math>\tan { d_f } = \frac{ \sin d_1 + \sin d_2 }{ \cos d_1 + \cos d_2 } </math>
| |
− |
| |
− | Unfortunately, this term is not simple to calculate. Worse yet, the shape is represented by
| |
− |
| |
− | <math> d _1 c / 2 </math>
| |
− |
| |
− | As long as this term, which represents the phase-shift between the mirror and the front of the diamond, remains constant, the diamond is a constant shape. Any variation in the diamond's shape (and therefore distance from the apparatus) will cause a greater phase-shift.
| |
− |
| |
− | We can use small-angle approximations to estimate <math> d _f </math>, but that approach seems invalid when all numbers are extremely small. A solution to this problem is necessary to proceed.
| |
| | | |
| == Future Updates == | | == Future Updates == |
Line 70: |
Line 61: |
| * Improve the mathematical syntax on this page | | * Improve the mathematical syntax on this page |
| * Calculate precise shape terms- solve the <math> d _f </math> problem | | * Calculate precise shape terms- solve the <math> d _f </math> problem |
− | * Compensate for interference and internal reflection</math> | + | * Compensate for interference and internal reflection |