Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:  
The combined wave equation is unimportant, since we only record its amplitude, which is
 
The combined wave equation is unimportant, since we only record its amplitude, which is
   −
<math>A^2 _{total} = C _1 A^2 + C _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 A^2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math>
+
<math>A^2 _{12} = C _1 A^2 + C _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 A^2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math>
   −
<math>A^2 _{total} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math>
+
<math>A^2 _{12} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) </math>
    
Because the wave reflecting off the back of the diamond travels through the diamond twice, the term <math> d _2 - d _1 </math> is twice the thickness of the diamond, in seconds. Because this measurement is in unhelpful units, we can multiply it by the speed of light in a diamond and divide by two for the thickness <math> \tau </math>.
 
Because the wave reflecting off the back of the diamond travels through the diamond twice, the term <math> d _2 - d _1 </math> is twice the thickness of the diamond, in seconds. Because this measurement is in unhelpful units, we can multiply it by the speed of light in a diamond and divide by two for the thickness <math> \tau </math>.
Line 45: Line 45:  
Therefore, we can rewrite the earlier equation in terms of <math> \tau </math>:
 
Therefore, we can rewrite the earlier equation in terms of <math> \tau </math>:
   −
<math>A^2 _{total} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( 2 \tau / V _d ) </math>
+
<math>A^2 _{12} / A^2 = C _1 + C _2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( 2 \tau / V _d ) </math>
    
== Calculating the Shape ==
 
== Calculating the Shape ==
   −
Of course, thickness is not the only thing we need. We will also detect a third laser, which reflects off the mirror. We can calculate that the amplitude of this new combined wave will be
+
Of course, thickness is not the only thing we need. After calculating <math> \tau </math> and uncovering the mirror, we will also detect the third laser reflection. We can calculate that the amplitude of this new combined wave will be
   −
<math>A^2 _{recieved} = A^2 + A^2 _t + 2 A A _t \cos ( d _t ) </math>
+
<math>A^2 _{123} = A^2 + C^2 _1 A^2 + C^2 _2 A^2 + 2 C _1 C _2 \cos ( d _2 - d _1 ) + 2 C _1 \cos ( - d _1 ) + 2 C _2 \cos ( - d _2 ) </math>
   −
Because we have values for A and <math> A _t </math>, we can almost find <math>A _{recieved} </math>. Unfortunately, we lack values for the new phase-shift term, which is a function of the phase-shifts of <math> \Psi _1 </math> and <math> \Psi _2 </math>. This can be easily expressed as
+
   −
<math>\tan { d_f } = \frac{ \sin d_1 + \sin d_2 }{ \cos d_1 + \cos d_2 } </math>
  −
  −
Unfortunately, this term is not simple to calculate. Worse yet, the shape is represented by
  −
  −
<math> d _1 c / 2 </math>
  −
  −
As long as this term, which represents the phase-shift between the mirror and the front of the diamond, remains constant, the diamond is a constant shape. Any variation in the diamond's shape (and therefore distance from the apparatus) will cause a greater phase-shift.
  −
  −
We can use small-angle approximations to estimate <math> d _f </math>, but that approach seems invalid when all numbers are extremely small. A solution to this problem is necessary to proceed.
      
== Future Updates ==
 
== Future Updates ==
Line 70: Line 61:  
* Improve the mathematical syntax on this page
 
* Improve the mathematical syntax on this page
 
* Calculate precise shape terms- solve the <math> d _f </math> problem
 
* Calculate precise shape terms- solve the <math> d _f </math> problem
* Compensate for interference and internal reflection</math>
+
* Compensate for interference and internal reflection
135

edits

Navigation menu