Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
149 bytes added ,  22:18, 12 February 2008
Line 218: Line 218:     
Without the second change above, the fit to the data is significantly worse.  It might be explained by the tendency of cross-talk to bunch up because of self-coupling feedback.  A simpler explanation might be that it takes into account a natural variation in the light output of the pulser from pulse to pulse.  This remains to be investigated.  The parameters of the fit function listed in the above plots are listed below.
 
Without the second change above, the fit to the data is significantly worse.  It might be explained by the tendency of cross-talk to bunch up because of self-coupling feedback.  A simpler explanation might be that it takes into account a natural variation in the light output of the pulser from pulse to pulse.  This remains to be investigated.  The parameters of the fit function listed in the above plots are listed below.
 +
 
# Integral of fit function, in rescaled (''pe'') x-axis units.
 
# Integral of fit function, in rescaled (''pe'') x-axis units.
 
# Centroid of zero ''pe'' peak, in V-s.
 
# Centroid of zero ''pe'' peak, in V-s.
Line 227: Line 228:  
# σ parameter of peak shape function, see above
 
# σ parameter of peak shape function, see above
 
# β parameter of peak shape function, see above
 
# β parameter of peak shape function, see above
 +
 +
The Fortran source code where the fit function is implemented can be found [http://zeus.phys.uconn.edu/halld/siliconPM/fits-2-2008/pshape.f here].
    
= Links =
 
= Links =

Navigation menu