Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:  
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
The ablation rate was calculated using the model shown below in Eq. 1
 +
and accounts for the overlap between neighboring laser pulses as well as the
 +
12
 +
fluctuations in laser energy (elaser) from row to row.
 +
R(elaser) = U(y) ∗ δx ∗ δy
 +
V0
 +
(1)
 +
U(y) is the number of microns removed (in µm) from the diamond surface
 +
after ablation at a particular y coordinate as measured from the Zygo interferometer,
 +
δx and δy are the distances between neighboring pulses (both
 +
10µm) and V0 was a normalization parameter representing the depth cut in
 +
diamond from a single laser pulse. The data collected from Figure 9a was
 +
used in Eq. 1 and plotted as a function of the laser energy shown in Figure
 +
9b. The fit of Figure 9 was made using a second order polynomial and is
 +
shown below in Eq. 2.
 +
R(elaser) = 245.347x
 +
2 + 5.440x − 2.390 (2)
 +
During the ablation process the average laser energy was measured for
 +
each completed row and the corresponding ablation rate was calculated using
 +
Eq. 2. The ablation rate calculated from the last completed row was used
 +
to determine its overlap with the next row of laser pulses. The overlap was
 +
adjusted by weighting a standard step size made by the y-translation stage
 +
(y-step) by the ratio of the measured ablation rate with a desired rate of
 +
ablation as shown in Eq. 2.
 +
delta-y = R(measured)
 +
R(desired)
 +
∗ y-step (3)
 +
Stacking laser pulses on top of eachother increases the amount of diamond
 +
material removed within the region of overlap. This method was used to
 +
account for laser energy fluctuations while differentially ablating diamond to
 +
within ±0.5µm surface variation.
    
==Ablation Rate==
 
==Ablation Rate==
581

edits

Navigation menu