Line 71:
Line 71:
|-
|-
|}
|}
+
+
The ablation rate was calculated using the model shown below in Eq. 1
+
and accounts for the overlap between neighboring laser pulses as well as the
+
12
+
fluctuations in laser energy (elaser) from row to row.
+
R(elaser) = U(y) ∗ δx ∗ δy
+
V0
+
(1)
+
U(y) is the number of microns removed (in µm) from the diamond surface
+
after ablation at a particular y coordinate as measured from the Zygo interferometer,
+
δx and δy are the distances between neighboring pulses (both
+
10µm) and V0 was a normalization parameter representing the depth cut in
+
diamond from a single laser pulse. The data collected from Figure 9a was
+
used in Eq. 1 and plotted as a function of the laser energy shown in Figure
+
9b. The fit of Figure 9 was made using a second order polynomial and is
+
shown below in Eq. 2.
+
R(elaser) = 245.347x
+
2 + 5.440x − 2.390 (2)
+
During the ablation process the average laser energy was measured for
+
each completed row and the corresponding ablation rate was calculated using
+
Eq. 2. The ablation rate calculated from the last completed row was used
+
to determine its overlap with the next row of laser pulses. The overlap was
+
adjusted by weighting a standard step size made by the y-translation stage
+
(y-step) by the ratio of the measured ablation rate with a desired rate of
+
ablation as shown in Eq. 2.
+
delta-y = R(measured)
+
R(desired)
+
∗ y-step (3)
+
Stacking laser pulses on top of eachother increases the amount of diamond
+
material removed within the region of overlap. This method was used to
+
account for laser energy fluctuations while differentially ablating diamond to
+
within ±0.5µm surface variation.
==Ablation Rate==
==Ablation Rate==