SiPM Amplifier

The silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) we are using in our experiment were purchased from Photonique. Photonique also supplies analog electronics boards to amplify the signals from the SiPMs. This page discusses the analysis and modeling of the amplifier circuit.

The circuit diagram

Component values

Part	On-chip label	Actual component
Resistors
$R_{1}$	104	$100{\mbox{k}}\Omega$
$R_{2}$	103	$10{\mbox{k}}\Omega$
$R_{3}$	562	$5.6{\mbox{k}}\Omega$
$R_{4}$	202	$2{\mbox{k}}\Omega$
$R_{5}$	102	$1{\mbox{k}}\Omega$
$R_{6}$	510	$51\Omega$
$R_{7}$	241	$240\Omega$
Transistors
$VT_{1}$	E2P (1717)	Philips BFS 17A
$VT_{2}$	W1S (13)	Philips BFT 92

The amplifier circuit diagram shown here was developed through combining the diagram supplied by Photonique (lacking component values, and having several extra components) and the physical circuit (having most components labeled).

The component values are shown to the right. The capacitors are unlabeled on any diagram, so values are not known for those components.

MATLAB model

Main article: MATLAB amplifer in detail

We developed a model for this circuit in MATLAB to simulate its behavior and study various parameters, especially gain as a function of power voltage. The Photonique documentation claims that the power voltage can be varied between four and nine volts in order to tune the gain of the amplifier. The MATLAB model is a linearized system of twenty-four equations, with the voltages and currents on the circuit being the twenty-four unknowns. There are four input parameters: input current ($I_{in}$, in amps), the bias voltage ($V_{b}$, in volts), the power voltage ($V_{c}$, in volts), and the frequency ($f$, in hertz). The resistor values are mostly the same as the ones given for the above diagram, except for $R_{4}$ (now $1.2{\mbox{k}}\Omega$) and $R_{6}$ (now $53\Omega$). We also add a load resistor from $V_{out}$ to GND, with a value of $50{\mbox{k}}\Omega$. The transistors are described by a series of parameters from the Gummel-Poon SPICE model, and we included our best guesses of the capacitor values.

Responses of the model

We ran simulations of the MATLAB model while varying the input parameters to generate data on how the amplifier responds to each input. We used as a baseline test the inputs $V_{b}=20{\mbox{V}}$, $V_{c}=5{\mbox{V}}$, $f=100{\mbox{MHz}}$, and $I_{in}=1{\mbox{mA}}$, then varied one parameter at a time to generate responses.

Bias voltage

Varying the bias voltage from 0 to 50V. Within this range the output ($V_{out}$) does not vary at all.

Power voltage

The amplifier's response to varying the power voltage ($V_{c}$) from 0 to 10V is shown in the image below.

Note that the vertical axis can be read as either the output voltage ($V_{out}$) in mV or as the transimpedance gain in k$\Omega$.

Frequency

The amplifier's response to varying the frequency ($f$) is shown in the image below.

Note that the vertical axis can be read as either the output voltage ($V_{out}$) in mV or as the transimpedance gain in k$\Omega$.

Input current

Varying the input current from 0 to 2A results in a clean straight line. Performing a linear regression results in the equation

$V_{out}=3.2534{\mbox{k}}\Omega \cdot I_{in}$.

Thus we can say that the amplifier has a transimpedance gain ($3.2534{\mbox{k}}\Omega$ under the conditions given above) and no DC bias.