Fiber Array Prototype and Mass Production

From UConn PAN
Revision as of 19:15, 1 November 2009 by Bpratt18 (talk | contribs) (→‎Cleaving)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Purpose

The purpose of this page is to outline the steps taken to produce a working prototype of the fiber array. This page will be updated as more trials and tribulations occur so that future researchers working on this project will have a solid set of instruction. Most of the improvements on the fabrication techniques could not have been possible with out the work of Carl Nettleton and Sarah Lamb and their contribution is greatly appreciated.

Cleaving

Previously fiber bundles were cut using a fly cutter by Alan Chasse. The fly cutter would crack the cladding of the outside fibers and were considered to be "sacrificial" reducing efficiency by 64%. However, an end mill has been used in the last cutting attempts with extremely favorable results. At most two fibers have experienced outer cladding damage and even so the fibers will be usable after gluing and painting. This will greatly increase the mass production of multiple bundles and pictures of the fibers response to both the fly cutter and end mill will be posted soon.

After many end mill runs, the standard 1/4 inch two fluted mill has been replaced with a 1/4 inch four fluted bit. We are hoping that the bit will reduce outer cladding damage as a result of a smaller cutting area per flute. Also, a cold air chiller has been constructed by Jim McIntyre to reduce the surface temperature of the milled fibers. This will allow for higher milling rpms of the fibers and ultimately higher quality fibers.

Polishing

I have spent the most of my time researching and perfecting the polishing techniques required to yield a fiber of final product quality. Stream lining the production process is the main focus of my efforts concerning the waveguides and scintillators and to do so I am exploring the following new techniques for polishing.

  • By standardizing the sequence of sandpaper grit and manufacturer we can not only eliminate the variance between nailbrush companies, but we can also decrease the training time required for new students to learn the polishing techniques.
  • Finer grit sandpaper ( 400, 600, 1500, and 2000 grit made by 3m) has just been brought in and I hope to post new pictures showing the quality of polish for each grade of paper for reference.
  • After researching other experiments using scintillating tubes I found that Jefferson Laboratories uses a plastic polish for their fibers. We will soon test Novus Plastic Polish for its effectiveness in polishing the waveguides and scintillators. Below is a link to the Novus website as well as to the Jefferson Lab website where the information was found.
  • http://www.novuspolish.com/
  • www.jlab.org/~cecire/share/mparts.doc

These are polished fibers that were worked on for over an hour each. They were cut without using the fly cutter and so you can notice on the scintillating fiber a presence of outer cladding. These images will serve as a reference of comparison for when we begin using the Novus Plastic Polish.

 

Gluing

The first of many trial gluing sessions was completed this week (8/31-9/4) with favorable results. Only three of the eleven fibers broke after curing which is an increase from past attempts. This is attributed to the new gluing station that was designed earlier which allows the glue to stay out of contact with anything but the ends of the fibers. I plan on keeping notes on which of the eleven gluing channels produced successful fibers so that I can determine if there is a slight defect in the alignment of the two opposing channels.

Painting

New improvements to the painting of the fibers includes the use of an airbrush for a finer distribution of paint. In the past, black spray paint from a can was used with relatively good results. If we are able to reduce the thickness of paint applied to each fiber however, we will reduce the chance of electrons falling into the gaps between fibers.

Assembly

more info coming soon