|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | </math> | | </math> |
| | | | |
| − | where we take ''n'' coherent amplitudes and allow incoherent sums indexed by | + | where the PWA sum is over ''n'' coherent amplitudes, and indices γ, δ represent the |
| − | γ, δ to allow for applications like spin-density matrices (ρ). | + | spins of the external particles (incoming photon, incoming and outgoing nucleon), with ρ |
| | + | representing their collective spin-density matrix. |
| | When amplitude analysis fits contain amplitudes with not free parameters, it is convenient to | | When amplitude analysis fits contain amplitudes with not free parameters, it is convenient to |
| | rearrange the summations above, to pre-compute the sum over the intensities of the events: | | rearrange the summations above, to pre-compute the sum over the intensities of the events: |
Revision as of 17:00, 22 November 2011
The following is a review of error propagation needed to compute the errors on the normalization integrals and the intensity sum that is based on them. Consider the estimator for the intensity for a given PWA solution, based on a sum over a Monte Carlo sample with Ngen phase space events generated and N reconstructed and passing all cuts.
where the PWA sum is over n coherent amplitudes, and indices γ, δ represent the
spins of the external particles (incoming photon, incoming and outgoing nucleon), with ρ
representing their collective spin-density matrix.
When amplitude analysis fits contain amplitudes with not free parameters, it is convenient to
rearrange the summations above, to pre-compute the sum over the intensities of the events:
storing the term in square brackets, a matrix indexed by α,β, for contractions with varying free production parameters u in the course of a fit.
When considering the uncertainty on the overall integral, both the errors on u parameters
and those from the finite MC set of events will contribute. A single detected event (i) can be viewed as one sample in a process of independent events, having therefore a count uncertainty of
σi=1. An integral over such events is then a weighted sum of such samples,
having resulting in a contribution to the variance:
![{\displaystyle =\sum _{\gamma ,\delta ,\gamma ',\delta '}{\rho _{\gamma \delta }\rho _{\gamma '\delta '}\sum _{\alpha ,\beta ,\alpha ',\beta '}^{n}{u_{\alpha }u_{\beta }^{*}u_{\alpha '}u_{\beta '}^{*}\left[{\frac {1}{N_{gen}^{2}}}\sum _{i}^{N}{A_{\alpha }^{\gamma \delta }(x_{i})A_{\beta }^{\gamma \delta *}(x_{i})A_{\alpha '}^{\gamma '\delta '}(x_{i})A_{\beta '}^{\gamma '\delta '*}(x_{i})}\right]}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/aa9188ebc84f6b7eea721d1b8ae1d11c37bebc7f)
The relevant piece to pre-compute over the event set for error calculation is shown in brackets.
Turning our attention now to the contribution to error on the production parameters u:



The product of σ terms in the summation is represented by the error matrix derived from the fit. G was defined as
The overall uncertainty in the integral I defined in the beginning comes out to: