|
|
| Line 82: |
Line 82: |
| | | | |
| | === Production === | | === Production === |
| | + | |
| | + | ==== Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and <math>\pi</math> rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.) |
| | + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> |
| | + | |
| | + | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows: |
| | + | <br><math>| J m \epsilon \rangle = | J m \rangle + \epsilon P (-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> |
| | + | |
| | + | such that |
| | + | |
| | + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \epsilon \rangle = \epsilon (-1)^{2J} | J m \epsilon \rangle </math> |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well: |
| | + | <br>Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+) |
| | + | |
| | + | <math>|\mp\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\pm 1}{2}} \left( |1 -1\rangle \mp |1 +1\rangle \right)</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | <math>\mathbb{R}|\mp\rangle = \mp 1 |\mp\rangle </math> |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity: |
| | + | <math>V=\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | <math> |
| | + | \langle J m \epsilon|\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}| |
| | + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle = |
| | + | \epsilon (\mp 1) \epsilon_R \langle J m \epsilon|V| |
| | + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle |
| | + | </math> |
| | + | |
| | + | Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the |
| | + | resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint: |
| | + | <br><math>\epsilon = \mp \epsilon_R</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | ==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== | | ==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== |
| Line 90: |
Line 127: |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td><math> | | <td><math> |
| − | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle | + | \langle \Omega_R ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; J_P \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle |
| | = | | = |
| − | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | + | \langle \Omega_R ; J_R \lambda_R \; \mp\epsilon; \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;\lambda_p |
| − | | J m \lambda_R \lambda_p \rangle \langle J m \lambda_R \lambda_p | | + | | \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \lambda_R \lambda_p \rangle \langle \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \lambda_R \lambda_p | |
| − | W | J_T m_T \rangle | + | W | \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \rangle |
| | </math></td> | | </math></td> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| Line 104: |
Line 141: |
| | <tr> | | <tr> |
| | <td><math> | | <td><math> |
| − | =\sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m_T (\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{J_T *} (\Omega_R,0) w_{\lambda_R , \lambda_p}^{J_T} | + | =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \left[ |
| | + | D_{m_T (\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{\frac{1}{2} *} (\Omega_R,0) \; w_{\lambda_R\; \lambda_p} |
| | + | \mp |
| | + | \epsilon P_R (-1)^{J_R-\lambda_R} |
| | + | D_{m_T (-\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{\frac{1}{2} *} (\Omega_R,0) \; w_{\lambda_R\; -\lambda_p} |
| | + | \right] |
| | </math></td> | | </math></td> |
| | <td> | | <td> |
| Line 112: |
Line 154: |
| | </table> | | </table> |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | ==== Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex ====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and <math>\pi</math> rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.)
| |
| − | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows:
| |
| − | <br><math>| J m \epsilon \rangle = | J m \rangle + \epsilon P (-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math>
| |
| − | <br> such that
| |
| − | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \epsilon \rangle = \epsilon | J m \epsilon \rangle </math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well:
| |
| − | <br>Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+)
| |
| − | <br><math>|\mp\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\pm 1}{2}} \left( |1 -1\rangle \mp |1 +1\rangle \right)</math>
| |
| − | <br><math>\mathbb{R}|\mp\rangle = \mp 1 |\mp\rangle </math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity:
| |
| − | <br><math>V=\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}</math>
| |
| − | <br><math>
| |
| − | \langle J m \epsilon|\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}|
| |
| − | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle =
| |
| − | \epsilon (\mp 1) \epsilon_R \langle J m \epsilon|V|
| |
| − | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle
| |
| − | </math>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the
| |
| − | resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint:
| |
| − | <br><math>\epsilon = \mp \epsilon_R</math>
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
General Relations
Angular Distribution of Two-Body Decay
Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers J,m. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state having daughter 1 with trajectory
.
We can also describe the angular momentum between the daughters as being L and spin sum as s. Alternatively, we will label the daughters as having helicities of
and
- projections on the direction of decay (specified by daughter 1)
 |
insertion of the complete set of helicity basis vectors
|
 |
insertion of the complete LS basis set
|
![{\displaystyle =\sum _{L,S}\left[{\sqrt {\frac {2J+1}{4\pi }}}D_{m\lambda }^{J*}(\Omega ,0)\right]\left[{\sqrt {\frac {2L+1}{2J+1}}}\left({\begin{array}{cc|c}L&S&J\\0&\lambda &\lambda \end{array}}\right)\left({\begin{array}{cc|c}S_{1}&S_{2}&S\\\lambda _{1}&-\lambda _{2}&\lambda \end{array}}\right)\right]a_{LS}^{J}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a93b86e837aee85c12249ab0f791a8c2693e53e6) |
Substitution of each bra-ket with their respective formulae.
Note that in the event of one daughter being spin-less, the second
Clebsch-Gordan coefficient is 1
|
Isospin Projections
One must also take into account the various ways isospin of daughters can add up to the isospin quantum numbers of the parent, requiring a term:
where a=1 and b=2, referring to the daughter number. Because an even-symmetric angular wave function (i.e. L=0,2...) imply that 180 degree rotation is equivalent to reversal of daughter identities (a,b becoming b,a) one must write down the symmetrized expression:
Application
Production
Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex
Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and
rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.)
The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows:
such that
The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well:
Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+)
Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity:
Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the
resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint:
Proton-Reggeon vertex
The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as:
Decay