Difference between revisions of "Amplitudes for the Exotic b1π Decay"

From UConn PAN
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
U | J m \rangle
 
U | J m \rangle
 
</math>
 
</math>
We can also describe the angular momentum between the daughters as being ''L'' and their spin sum as ''s''. Alternatively, we will label the daughters as having helicities of <math>\lambda_1</math> and <math>\lambda_2</math> - projections of the two particles' spins onto their respective momentum directions.
+
Instead of specifying the final-state particles' spin state via their helicities, we can first couple their spins together independent of their momentum direction, to obtain total spin ''S'', then couple ''S'' to their relative orbital angular momentum ''L'' to obtain their total angular momentum ''J''.
<tr>
+
:<math>
<td><math>
 
 
\langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle
 
\langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle
 
=
 
=

Revision as of 19:32, 12 August 2011

General Relations

Angular Distribution of Two-Body Decay

Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers J,m. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state for having daughter 1 with momentum direction in the center of mass reference frame, and helicity , while daughter 2 has direction and helicity .

Let U be the decay operator from the initial state into the given 2-body final state. Intermediate between the at-rest initial state of qn J,m and the final plane-wave state is a basis of outgoing waves describing the outgoing 2-body state in a basis of good J,m and helicities. Insertion of the complete set of intermediate basis vectors, and summing over all intermediate J,m gives

Instead of specifying the final-state particles' spin state via their helicities, we can first couple their spins together independent of their momentum direction, to obtain total spin S, then couple S to their relative orbital angular momentum L to obtain their total angular momentum J.

insertion of the complete LS basis set

Substitution of each bra-ket with their respective formulae. Note that in the event of one daughter being spin-less, the second Clebsch-Gordan coefficient is 1

Isospin Projections

One must also take into account the various ways isospin of daughters can add up to the isospin quantum numbers of the parent, requiring a term:

where a=1 and b=2, referring to the daughter number. Because an even-symmetric angular wave function (i.e. L=0,2...) imply that 180 degree rotation is equivalent to reversal of daughter identities (a,b becoming b,a) one must write down the symmetrized expression:

Application

Production

Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex

Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.)

The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows:

such that



The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well:
Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+)


Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity:

Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint:


Proton-Reggeon vertex

The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as:

transition amplitude for in the direction w.r.t. the coordinate system defined in the resonance RF.

follows from relations given above



Decay