Difference between revisions of "Fiber Dimension Statistics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The raw data for all of the reported statistics on this page can be found in [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AZPVzbwDgBWl5UXUVSnz_8_0yO6rmNUTt_MeylHasTQ/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0 this] spreadsheet | The raw data for all of the reported statistics on this page can be found in [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AZPVzbwDgBWl5UXUVSnz_8_0yO6rmNUTt_MeylHasTQ/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0 this] spreadsheet | ||
− | ==Average Width of Fibers== | + | ==Average Width of Fibers== [[File:Total Average.png|200px|thumb|right|something s.]] |
An analysis on the average width of the fibers was performed to check how many were over the desired average width (2.03mm). The width of each fiber was measured at fifteen different points as a part of the cutting process. Histogram A shows the spread of average fiber width; while most fibers are below the 2.03mm benchmark, there are still a significant amount | An analysis on the average width of the fibers was performed to check how many were over the desired average width (2.03mm). The width of each fiber was measured at fifteen different points as a part of the cutting process. Histogram A shows the spread of average fiber width; while most fibers are below the 2.03mm benchmark, there are still a significant amount |
Revision as of 01:24, 6 May 2016
This page was created by Andrew Sampino who's logbook for spring 2016 can be found here
The raw data for all of the reported statistics on this page can be found in this spreadsheet
==Average Width of Fibers==
An analysis on the average width of the fibers was performed to check how many were over the desired average width (2.03mm). The width of each fiber was measured at fifteen different points as a part of the cutting process. Histogram A shows the spread of average fiber width; while most fibers are below the 2.03mm benchmark, there are still a significant amount