| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers ''J'',''m''. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state for having daughter 1 with momentum direction <math>\Omega=(\phi,\theta)</math> in the center of mass reference frame, and helicity <math>\lambda_1</math>, while daughter 2 has direction <math>-\Omega=(\phi+\pi,\pi-\theta)</math> and helicity <math>\lambda_2</math>. | | Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers ''J'',''m''. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state for having daughter 1 with momentum direction <math>\Omega=(\phi,\theta)</math> in the center of mass reference frame, and helicity <math>\lambda_1</math>, while daughter 2 has direction <math>-\Omega=(\phi+\pi,\pi-\theta)</math> and helicity <math>\lambda_2</math>. |
| | | | |
| − | Let U be the decay operator from the initial state into the given 2-body final state. Intermediate between the at-rest initial state of quantum numbers (qn) J,m and the final plane-wave state is a basis of outgoing waves describing the outgoing 2-body state in a basis of good J,m and helicities. Insertion of the complete set of intermediate basis vectors, and summing over all intermediate J,m gives | + | Let U be the decay operator from the initial state into the given 2-body final state. Intermediate between the at-rest initial state of quantum numbers (qn) J,M and the final plane-wave state is a basis of outgoing waves describing the outgoing 2-body state in a basis of good J,m and helicities. Insertion of the complete set of intermediate basis vectors, and summing over all intermediate J,m gives |
| | :<math> | | :<math> |
| | \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J M \rangle | | \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J M \rangle |
| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | :<math> | | :<math> |
| | =\sum_{L,S} | | =\sum_{L,S} |
| − | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m \lambda}^{J *}(\Omega) \right] | + | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{M \lambda}^{J *}(\Omega) \right] |
| | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2L+1}{2J+1}} | | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2L+1}{2J+1}} |
| | \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} | | \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} |
| Line 64: |
Line 64: |
| | | | |
| | Acting on a state of good ''J,m'', the reflectivity operator has a particularly simple effect. | | Acting on a state of good ''J,m'', the reflectivity operator has a particularly simple effect. |
| − | :<math>\mathbb{R}| J M \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -M \rangle </math> | + | :<math>\mathbb{R}| J M \rangle = P(-1)^{J-M} | J \; -M \rangle </math> |
| | where P is the intrinsic parity of the system. | | where P is the intrinsic parity of the system. |
| | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed out of states of good ''J,M'' as follows. | | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed out of states of good ''J,M'' as follows. |
| Line 207: |
Line 207: |
| | :<math> | | :<math> |
| | T_{(f)(i)} = | | T_{(f)(i)} = |
| − | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b1} \mathbf{p}_f \epsilon_f) | + | T_{(\mathbf{q}_\pi \mathbf{q}_\rho \mathbf{q}_\omega \mathbf{q}_{b_1} \mathbf{p}_f \epsilon_f) |
| | (\mathbf{k}_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma \mathbf{p}_i \epsilon_i)}= | | (\mathbf{k}_\gamma \epsilon_\gamma \mathbf{p}_i \epsilon_i)}= |
| | </math> | | </math> |
| | :::<math> | | :::<math> |
| | =\sum_{R,\lambda_R,\epsilon_R;\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | | =\sum_{R,\lambda_R,\epsilon_R;\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} |
| − | \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b1}\lambda_{b1} 0 | + | \langle \mathbf{q}_\pi 0 0; \mathbf{q}_\rho \lambda_\rho 0; \mathbf{q}_\omega \lambda_\omega 0; \mathbf{q}_{b_1}\lambda_{b_1} 0 |
| | | UV | \epsilon_\gamma; \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0\rangle | | | UV | \epsilon_\gamma; \lambda_R \epsilon_R; \Omega_0\rangle |
| | </math> | | </math> |
| Line 315: |
Line 315: |
| | q(m) = \sqrt{\left(\frac{m^2+m_1^2-m_2^2}{2m}\right)^2-m_1^2} | | q(m) = \sqrt{\left(\frac{m^2+m_1^2-m_2^2}{2m}\right)^2-m_1^2} |
| | </math> | | </math> |
| − | The functions <math>F_L(q)</math> are the angular momentum barrier factors that are given in the literature. | + | The functions <math>F_L(q)</math> are the angular momentum barrier factors that are given in the literature. The first few are listed below with <math>z=[q/(197\mathrm{MeV/c})]^2</math> |
| − | | + | :<math>\displaystyle F_0(q)=1</math> |
| − | : ''The first few of these barrier factors should be listed explicitly here.''
| + | :<math>F_1(q)= |
| | + | \sqrt{\frac{2z}{z+1}} |
| | + | </math> |
| | + | :<math>F_2(q)= |
| | + | \sqrt{\frac{13z^2}{(z-3)^2+9z}} |
| | + | </math> |
| | + | :<math>F_3(q)= |
| | + | \sqrt{\frac{277z^3}{z(z-15)^2+9(2z-5)^2}} |
| | + | </math> |
| | | | |
| | ===Describing s and t dependence=== | | ===Describing s and t dependence=== |
| Line 331: |
Line 339: |
| | The T Matrix, written in the photon reflectivity basis can be expanded in the photon's lab frame helicity basis. Temporarily omitting indices not pertaining to the photon: | | The T Matrix, written in the photon reflectivity basis can be expanded in the photon's lab frame helicity basis. Temporarily omitting indices not pertaining to the photon: |
| | :<math> | | :<math> |
| − | T_{\epsilon_\gamma} = \frac{\sqrt{-\epsilon_\gamma}}{2} | + | T_{\epsilon_\gamma} = \sqrt{\frac{-\epsilon_\gamma}{2}} |
| | \left( T_{-1}e^{-i\alpha} - \epsilon_\gamma T_{+1}e^{i\alpha} \right) | | \left( T_{-1}e^{-i\alpha} - \epsilon_\gamma T_{+1}e^{i\alpha} \right) |
| | </math> | | </math> |