Difference between revisions of "Amplitudes for the Exotic b1π Decay"
Senderovich (talk | contribs) |
Senderovich (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
=== Production === | === Production === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and <math>\pi</math> rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.) | ||
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows: | ||
| + | <br><math>| J m \epsilon \rangle = | J m \rangle + \epsilon P (-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | such that | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \epsilon \rangle = \epsilon (-1)^{2J} | J m \epsilon \rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well: | ||
| + | <br>Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+) | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>|\mp\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\pm 1}{2}} \left( |1 -1\rangle \mp |1 +1\rangle \right)</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math>\mathbb{R}|\mp\rangle = \mp 1 |\mp\rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity: | ||
| + | <math>V=\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <math> | ||
| + | \langle J m \epsilon|\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}| | ||
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle = | ||
| + | \epsilon (\mp 1) \epsilon_R \langle J m \epsilon|V| | ||
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle | ||
| + | </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the | ||
| + | resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint: | ||
| + | <br><math>\epsilon = \mp \epsilon_R</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== | ==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== | ||
| Line 90: | Line 127: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><math> | <td><math> | ||
| − | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle | + | \langle \Omega_R ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R; J_P \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle |
= | = | ||
| − | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | + | \langle \Omega_R ; J_R \lambda_R \; \mp\epsilon; \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;\lambda_p |
| − | | | + | | \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \lambda_R \lambda_p \rangle \langle \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \lambda_R \lambda_p | |
| − | W | | + | W | \textstyle{\frac{1}{2}}\;m_T \rangle |
</math></td> | </math></td> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
| Line 104: | Line 141: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><math> | <td><math> | ||
| − | = | + | =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \left[ |
| + | D_{m_T (\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{\frac{1}{2} *} (\Omega_R,0) \; w_{\lambda_R\; \lambda_p} | ||
| + | \mp | ||
| + | \epsilon P_R (-1)^{J_R-\lambda_R} | ||
| + | D_{m_T (-\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{\frac{1}{2} *} (\Omega_R,0) \; w_{\lambda_R\; -\lambda_p} | ||
| + | \right] | ||
</math></td> | </math></td> | ||
<td> | <td> | ||
| Line 112: | Line 154: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 13:26, 12 August 2011
General Relations
Angular Distribution of Two-Body Decay
Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers J,m. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state having daughter 1 with trajectory . We can also describe the angular momentum between the daughters as being L and spin sum as s. Alternatively, we will label the daughters as having helicities of and - projections on the direction of decay (specified by daughter 1)
| Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle = \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 \rangle \langle J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle } |
insertion of the complete set of helicity basis vectors |
| Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle = \sum_{L,S} \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 \rangle \langle J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | J m L S \rangle \langle J m L S | U | J m \rangle } |
insertion of the complete LS basis set |
| Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle =\sum_{L,S} \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m \lambda}^{J *}(\Omega,0) \right] \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2L+1}{2J+1}} \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} L & S & J \\ 0 & \lambda & \lambda \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} S_1 & S_2 & S \\ \lambda_1 & -\lambda_2 & \lambda \end{array}\right) \right] a_{L S}^{J} } |
Substitution of each bra-ket with their respective formulae. Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \lambda=\lambda_1-\lambda_2} Note that in the event of one daughter being spin-less, the second Clebsch-Gordan coefficient is 1 |
Isospin Projections
One must also take into account the various ways isospin of daughters can add up to the isospin quantum numbers of the parent, requiring a term:
Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle C^{a,b} = \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} I^a & I^b & I \\ I_z^a & I_z^b & I_z^a+I_z^b \end{array}\right) }
where a=1 and b=2, referring to the daughter number. Because an even-symmetric angular wave function (i.e. L=0,2...) imply that 180 degree rotation is equivalent to reversal of daughter identities (a,b becoming b,a) one must write down the symmetrized expression:
Application
Production
Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex
Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.)
The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows:
such that
The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well:
Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+)
Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity:
Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the
resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint:
Proton-Reggeon vertex
The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as:
|
transition amplitude for in the direction w.r.t. the coordinate system defined in the resonance RF. |
|
|
follows from relations given above |
Decay