Difference between revisions of "Amplitudes for the Exotic b1π Decay"
Senderovich (talk | contribs) |
Senderovich (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
== Application == | == Application == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Production === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <table> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td><math> | ||
| + | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | ||
| + | | J m \lambda_R \lambda_p \rangle \langle J m \lambda_R \lambda_p | | ||
| + | W | J_T m_T \rangle | ||
| + | </math></td> | ||
| + | <td> | ||
| + | transition amplitude for <math>p \rightarrow R + p'</math> | ||
| + | in the direction <math>\Omega_R</math> w.r.t. the coordinate | ||
| + | system defined in the resonance RF. | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | <tr> | ||
| + | <td><math> | ||
| + | =\sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m_T (\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{J_T *} (\Omega_R,0) w_{\lambda_R , \lambda_p}^{J_T} | ||
| + | </math></td> | ||
| + | <td> | ||
| + | follows from relations given above | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | </tr> | ||
| + | </table> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and <math>\pi</math> rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.) | ||
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows: | ||
| + | <br><math>| J m \epsilon \rangle = | J m \rangle + \epsilon P (-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> | ||
| + | <br> such that | ||
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \epsilon \rangle = \epsilon | J m \epsilon \rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well: | ||
| + | <br>Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+) | ||
| + | <br><math>|\mp\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\pm 1}{2}} \left( |1 -1\rangle \mp |1 +1\rangle \right)</math> | ||
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}|\mp\rangle = \mp 1 |\mp\rangle </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity: | ||
| + | <br><math>V=\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}</math> | ||
| + | <br><math> | ||
| + | \langle J m \epsilon|\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}| | ||
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle = | ||
| + | \epsilon (\mp 1) \epsilon_R \langle J m \epsilon|V| | ||
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle | ||
| + | </math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the | ||
| + | resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint: | ||
| + | <br><math>\epsilon = \mp \epsilon_R</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Decay === | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
| Line 142: | Line 209: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
A^{J_X}=\sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | A^{J_X}=\sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | ||
| − | \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | | + | \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U_X | J_X m_X \rangle C_X(L_X) k^{L_X} |
| − | \langle \Omega_{b_1} 0 \lambda_\omega | | + | \langle \Omega_{b_1} 0 \lambda_\omega | U_{b_1} | 1 , m_{b_1}=\lambda_{b_1} \rangle C_{b_1}(L_{b_1}) q^{L_{b_1}} |
| − | \langle \Omega_\omega 0 \lambda_\rho | | + | \langle \Omega_\omega 0 \lambda_\rho | U_\omega | 1 , m_\omega=\lambda_\omega \rangle C_\omega(L_\omega) u^{L_\omega} |
| − | \langle \Omega_\rho 0 \lambda_\rho | | + | \langle \Omega_\rho 0 \lambda_\rho | U_\rho | J_\rho , m_\rho=\lambda_\rho \rangle C_\rho(L_\rho) v^{L_\rho} |
</math> | </math> | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 12 August 2011
General Relations
Angular Distribution of Two-Body Decay
Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers J,m. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state having daughter 1 with trajectory . We can also describe the angular momentum between the daughters as being L and spin sum as s. Alternatively, we will label the daughters as having helicities of and - projections on the direction of decay (specified by daughter 1)
|
insertion of the complete set of helicity basis vectors |
|
|
insertion of the complete LS basis set |
|
|
Substitution of each bra-ket with their respective formulae. Note that in the event of one daughter being spin-less, the second Clebsch-Gordan coefficient is 1 |
Isospin Projections
One must also take into account the various ways isospin of daughters can add up to the isospin quantum numbers of the parent, requiring a term:
where a=1 and b=2, referring to the daughter number. Because an even-symmetric angular wave function (i.e. L=0,2...) imply that 180 degree rotation is equivalent to reversal of daughter identities (a,b becoming b,a) one must write down the symmetrized expression:
Application
Production
Proton-Reggeon vertex
The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as:
|
transition amplitude for in the direction w.r.t. the coordinate system defined in the resonance RF. |
|
|
follows from relations given above |
Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex
Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.)
The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows:
such that
The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well:
Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+)
Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity:
Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the
resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint:
Decay