Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
96 bytes added ,  19:07, 2 June 2008
Line 96: Line 96:     
[[Image:BCF.jpg|thumb|right|300 px|A plot of BestCostFunktion versus Step Number]]
 
[[Image:BCF.jpg|thumb|right|300 px|A plot of BestCostFunktion versus Step Number]]
  −
[[Image:Temperature.jpg|thumb|left|300 px|A plot of BestCostFunktion versus Step Number]]
  −
      
== Running the MIR Solver/Scheduler ==
 
== Running the MIR Solver/Scheduler ==
Line 116: Line 113:  
'''justification:''' A visual inspection of each of the nodes' cost functions shows less and less hill climbing as step number progresses (and temperature decreases).  Since the number of this Cost Function density is periodic in step number, equalling about 7 in total (out of ten).  The 7 is a result of the information from each node being taken before the end of the run. (NOTE: the claim about temperature versus the costfunction will need to be tested.)
 
'''justification:''' A visual inspection of each of the nodes' cost functions shows less and less hill climbing as step number progresses (and temperature decreases).  Since the number of this Cost Function density is periodic in step number, equalling about 7 in total (out of ten).  The 7 is a result of the information from each node being taken before the end of the run. (NOTE: the claim about temperature versus the costfunction will need to be tested.)
   −
[[Image:CF_alpha_pt5.jpg]]
+
[[Image:CF_alpha_pt5.jpg|thumb|Cost Function for >= 7 Independent Runs]]
 +
[[Image:node_13_CF.jpg|thumb|Cost Function for Node 13 after about 5 ]]
 +
[[Image:node_13_CF_indiv.jpg|thumb|Cost Function for Node 13 indiv ]]
1,094

edits

Navigation menu