Line 80: |
Line 80: |
| | | |
| == Application == | | == Application == |
| + | |
| + | === Production === |
| + | |
| + | ==== Proton-Reggeon vertex ==== |
| + | |
| + | The amplitude of target proton's emission of an exchange particle, a reggeon, in particular direction and helicity projections can be written as: |
| + | |
| + | <table> |
| + | <tr> |
| + | <td><math> |
| + | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p | W | J_T m_T \rangle |
| + | = |
| + | \langle \Omega_R \lambda_R \lambda_p |
| + | | J m \lambda_R \lambda_p \rangle \langle J m \lambda_R \lambda_p | |
| + | W | J_T m_T \rangle |
| + | </math></td> |
| + | <td> |
| + | transition amplitude for <math>p \rightarrow R + p'</math> |
| + | in the direction <math>\Omega_R</math> w.r.t. the coordinate |
| + | system defined in the resonance RF. |
| + | </td> |
| + | </tr> |
| + | <tr> |
| + | <td><math> |
| + | =\sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m_T (\lambda_R-\lambda_p)}^{J_T *} (\Omega_R,0) w_{\lambda_R , \lambda_p}^{J_T} |
| + | </math></td> |
| + | <td> |
| + | follows from relations given above |
| + | </td> |
| + | </tr> |
| + | </table> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | ==== Photon-Reggeon-Resonance vertex ==== |
| + | |
| + | Consider the production of the resonance from the photon and reggeon in the reflectivity basis, the eigenstates of the reflectivity operator. (This operator is a combination of parity and <math>\pi</math> rotation about the normal to the production plane (usually y axis.) |
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \rangle = P(-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> |
| + | |
| + | The eigenstates of the reflectivity operator are formed as follows: |
| + | <br><math>| J m \epsilon \rangle = | J m \rangle + \epsilon P (-1)^{J-m} | J \; -m \rangle </math> |
| + | <br> such that |
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}| J m \epsilon \rangle = \epsilon | J m \epsilon \rangle </math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | The photon linear polarization states turn out to be eigenstates of reflectivity as well: |
| + | <br>Let x (y) polarization states be denoted with - (+) |
| + | <br><math>|\mp\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\pm 1}{2}} \left( |1 -1\rangle \mp |1 +1\rangle \right)</math> |
| + | <br><math>\mathbb{R}|\mp\rangle = \mp 1 |\mp\rangle </math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Since the production Hamiltonian should commute with reflectivity: |
| + | <br><math>V=\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}</math> |
| + | <br><math> |
| + | \langle J m \epsilon|\mathbb{R}^{-1} V \mathbb{R}| |
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle = |
| + | \epsilon (\mp 1) \epsilon_R \langle J m \epsilon|V| |
| + | \mp ; J_R \lambda_R \epsilon_R ; t, s; \Omega_0 \rangle |
| + | </math> |
| + | |
| + | Acting with the reflectivity operator on initial and final state brings out the reflectivity eigenvalues of the |
| + | resonance, photon and reggeon. This result leads to a constraint: |
| + | <br><math>\epsilon = \mp \epsilon_R</math> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | === Decay === |
| | | |
| <math> | | <math> |
Line 142: |
Line 209: |
| <math> | | <math> |
| A^{J_X}=\sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} | | A^{J_X}=\sum_{\lambda_{b_1},\lambda_\omega,\lambda_\rho} |
− | \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U | J_X m_X \rangle C_X(L_X) k^{L_X} | + | \langle \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U_X | J_X m_X \rangle C_X(L_X) k^{L_X} |
− | \langle \Omega_{b_1} 0 \lambda_\omega | U | 1 , m_{b_1}=\lambda_{b_1} \rangle C_{b_1}(L_{b_1}) q^{L_{b_1}} | + | \langle \Omega_{b_1} 0 \lambda_\omega | U_{b_1} | 1 , m_{b_1}=\lambda_{b_1} \rangle C_{b_1}(L_{b_1}) q^{L_{b_1}} |
− | \langle \Omega_\omega 0 \lambda_\rho | U | 1 , m_\omega=\lambda_\omega \rangle C_\omega(L_\omega) u^{L_\omega} | + | \langle \Omega_\omega 0 \lambda_\rho | U_\omega | 1 , m_\omega=\lambda_\omega \rangle C_\omega(L_\omega) u^{L_\omega} |
− | \langle \Omega_\rho 0 \lambda_\rho | U | J_\rho , m_\rho=\lambda_\rho \rangle C_\rho(L_\rho) v^{L_\rho} | + | \langle \Omega_\rho 0 \lambda_\rho | U_\rho | J_\rho , m_\rho=\lambda_\rho \rangle C_\rho(L_\rho) v^{L_\rho} |
| </math> | | </math> |