Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Let's begin with the amplitude for decay of a state X with some <math>J_X,M_X</math> quantum numbers:
| + | === Angular Distribution of Two-Body Decay === |
| | | |
| + | Let's begin with a general amplitude for the two-body decay of a state with angular momentum quantum numbers ''J'',''m''. Specifically, we want to know the amplitude of this state having daughter 1 with trajectory <math>\Omega=(\phi,\theta)</math>. |
| + | We can also describe the angular momentum between the daughters as being ''L'' and spin sum as ''s''. Alternatively, we will label the daughters as having helicities of <math>\lambda_1</math> and <math>\lambda_2</math> or direction of decay (specified by daughter 1) of |
| + | |
| + | <table> |
| + | <tr> |
| + | <td><math> |
| + | \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | U | J m \rangle |
| + | = |
| + | \sum_{L,S} |
| + | \langle \Omega \lambda_1 \lambda_2 |
| + | | J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 \rangle \langle J m \lambda_1 \lambda_2 | |
| + | J m L S \rangle \langle J m L S | |
| + | U | J m \rangle |
| + | </math></td> |
| + | <td> |
| + | simple insertion of complete sets of states for recoupling |
| + | </td> |
| + | </tr> |
| + | |
| + | <tr> |
| + | <td><math> |
| + | =\sum_{L,S} |
| + | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}} D_{m \lambda}^{J *}(\Omega,0) \right] |
| + | \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2L+1}{2J+1}} |
| + | \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} |
| + | L & S & J \\ |
| + | 0 & \lambda & \lambda |
| + | \end{array}\right) |
| + | \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} |
| + | S_1 & S_2 & S \\ |
| + | \lambda_1 & -\lambda_2 & \lambda |
| + | \end{array}\right) |
| + | \right] |
| + | a_{L S}^{J} |
| + | </math></td> |
| + | <td> |
| + | Substitution of each bra-ket with their respective formulae. |
| + | <math>\lambda=\lambda_1-\lambda_2</math> |
| + | Note that in the event of one daughter being spin-less, the second |
| + | Clebsch-Gordan coefficient is 1 |
| + | </td> |
| + | </tr> |
| + | |
| + | </table> |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | === Isospin Projections === |
| + | |
| + | One must also take into account the various ways isospin of daughters can add up to the isospin quantum numbers of the parent, requiring a term: |
| | | |
| <math> | | <math> |
− | \langle
| + | C^{a,b} = |
− | \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1} | U_X | J_X m_X | + | \left(\begin{array}{cc|c} |
− | \rangle | + | I^a & I^b & I \\ |
− | =
| + | I_z^a & I_z^b & I_z^a+I_z^b |
− | \langle | + | \end{array}\right) |
− | \Omega_X 0 \lambda_{b_1}|J_X m_X L_X s_{b_1} \rangle \langle J_X m_X L_X s_{b_1} | U_X | J_X m_X
| + | </math> |
− | \rangle | + | |
| + | where ''a=1'' and ''b=2'', referring to the daughter number. Because an even-symmetric angular wave function (i.e. L=0,2...) imply that 180 degree rotation is equivalent to reversal of daughter identities, ''a,b'' becoming ''b,a'' on must write down the symmetrized expression: |
| + | |
| + | <math> |
| + | C=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ C^{a,b} + (-1)^L C^{b,a} \right] |
| </math> | | </math> |
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |