Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:  
[[Image:GP2000b.png|left|thumb|250px| Figure 4: Average laser output as a function of total shots fired.]]  
 
[[Image:GP2000b.png|left|thumb|250px| Figure 4: Average laser output as a function of total shots fired.]]  
 
An average cut depth of 38µm per complete pass would estimate a total of over 2.6 million pulses to reach the final depth of 20 µm or roughly 7 complete laser medium fills. The ablation setup has methods to compensate for fluctuations in average laser energy so that the diamond surface remains smooth to within ± 0.5µm (these methods will be discussed in detail in a later section). However, even with these corrections, allowing the average laser energy to vary by 50% over the course of a single pass results in non-uniform ablation across the diamond which is too exaggerated to compensate for. It is then desirable to extend the lifetime of the laser gas medium so that average power remains constant over a single pass. Ideally, the laser would have a gas life time which exceeds the total number of pulses required to bring the diamond sample to 20µm. An Oxford GP-2000 cryogenic gas purification system and Millipore particulate filter were installed in a closed loop with the laser cavity as shown in Figure 3. The system pumps the laser gas medium through a liquid nitrogen cold trap removing contaminants generated during the lasing process, extending the laser gas life time by over an order of magnitude. The plot below shows the average pulse energy as a function of pulses completed. Figure 4 shows the comparison between running the laser with (blue) and without (red) the gas purification system. Using the gas purifier in line with the laser cavity resulted in an order of magnitude increase in number of total pulses fired. Also, the average output energy of the laser increased significantly due to filtration of halogen spoiling contaminants inside the laser cavity. In some cases only a single fill was required to ablate a diamond from start to finish-greatly reducing the surface variation on the diamond radiator and the cost of running the machine. It is conclusive to say that without the use of the gas purification system this laser would not be viable for use as a light source for diamond ablation purposes.
 
An average cut depth of 38µm per complete pass would estimate a total of over 2.6 million pulses to reach the final depth of 20 µm or roughly 7 complete laser medium fills. The ablation setup has methods to compensate for fluctuations in average laser energy so that the diamond surface remains smooth to within ± 0.5µm (these methods will be discussed in detail in a later section). However, even with these corrections, allowing the average laser energy to vary by 50% over the course of a single pass results in non-uniform ablation across the diamond which is too exaggerated to compensate for. It is then desirable to extend the lifetime of the laser gas medium so that average power remains constant over a single pass. Ideally, the laser would have a gas life time which exceeds the total number of pulses required to bring the diamond sample to 20µm. An Oxford GP-2000 cryogenic gas purification system and Millipore particulate filter were installed in a closed loop with the laser cavity as shown in Figure 3. The system pumps the laser gas medium through a liquid nitrogen cold trap removing contaminants generated during the lasing process, extending the laser gas life time by over an order of magnitude. The plot below shows the average pulse energy as a function of pulses completed. Figure 4 shows the comparison between running the laser with (blue) and without (red) the gas purification system. Using the gas purifier in line with the laser cavity resulted in an order of magnitude increase in number of total pulses fired. Also, the average output energy of the laser increased significantly due to filtration of halogen spoiling contaminants inside the laser cavity. In some cases only a single fill was required to ablate a diamond from start to finish-greatly reducing the surface variation on the diamond radiator and the cost of running the machine. It is conclusive to say that without the use of the gas purification system this laser would not be viable for use as a light source for diamond ablation purposes.
 +
 +
    
==Laser Beamline==
 
==Laser Beamline==
[[Image:spherabs.png|right|thumb|200px|Zygo image of pulses made on diamond after passing through a single focusing lens.]] [[Image:goodfocus.png|right|thumb|200px|Zygo image of pulses made on diamond after passing through the three lens system.]]
+
[[Image:spherabs.png|right|thumb|200px|Figure 6:Zygo image of pulses made on diamond after passing through a single focusing lens.]] [[Image:goodfocus.png|right|thumb|200px|Figure 7:Zygo image of pulses made on diamond after passing through the three lens system.]]
[[Image:ablation_full.png|center|thumb|300px|Rendering of ablation beamline]]
+
[[Image:ablation_full.png|center|thumb|300px|Figure 8:Rendering of ablation beamline]]
Figure 1 illustrates the arrangement of the ablation set up. A series of quartz plates are positioned immediately in front of the laser aperture so that a small sample of the beam (<5%) is reflected onto two separate energy meters labeled energy meter 1 and energy meter 2. Energy meter 1 is part of the laser’s on board energy feedback system which is used to control the output energy and stabilize the pulse-to-pulse variation to within 5%. Energy meter 2 measures each laser pulse incident on the diamond target during the ablation process. Figure 5a shows two columns of broad asymmetric patterns in a diamond sample cut using only a single lens for a varying number of laser pulses. If the focal spot that created these patterns was rastered over an entire diamond it would result in a radiator with large surface variations rendering it unusable for GlueX.
+
Figure 8 illustrates the arrangement of the ablation set up. A series of quartz plates are positioned immediately in front of the laser aperture so that a small sample of the beam (<5%) is reflected onto two separate energy meters labeled energy meter 1 and energy meter 2. Energy meter 1 is part of the laser’s on board energy feedback system which is used to control the output energy and stabilize the pulse-to-pulse variation to within 5%. Energy meter 2 measures each laser pulse incident on the diamond target during the ablation process. Figure 6 shows two columns of broad asymmetric patterns in a diamond sample cut using only a single lens for a varying number of laser pulses. If the focal spot that created these patterns was rastered over an entire diamond it would result in a radiator with large surface variations rendering it unusable for GlueX.
    
The focus of the laser defines the cutting tool with which the diamond is shaped. An ill-defined focused will ablate non-uniformly as the diamond is rastered across it making it extremely difficult to cut uniformly to 20 µm thickness without cracking the thin diamond membrane. The geometry of the focus also determines the fluence (laser energy per cm^2 ) incident on the diamond surface. A tightly focused beam spot increases the available fluence, increasing the rate of ablation. It is therefore very important to measure the waist of the beam after L3 in the three lens system.  
 
The focus of the laser defines the cutting tool with which the diamond is shaped. An ill-defined focused will ablate non-uniformly as the diamond is rastered across it making it extremely difficult to cut uniformly to 20 µm thickness without cracking the thin diamond membrane. The geometry of the focus also determines the fluence (laser energy per cm^2 ) incident on the diamond surface. A tightly focused beam spot increases the available fluence, increasing the rate of ablation. It is therefore very important to measure the waist of the beam after L3 in the three lens system.  
The laser beam then passes through a series of lenses as shown in Figure 4. Lenses L1 and L2 are positioned with overlapping focal lengths so that the output of L2 is a highly parallel, expanded beam. This was to remove large spherical aberrations due to imperfections in the quartz lenses.
+
The laser beam then passes through a series of lenses as shown in Figure 8. Lenses L1 and L2 are positioned with overlapping focal lengths so that the output of L2 is a highly parallel, expanded beam. This was to remove large spherical aberrations due to imperfections in the quartz lenses.
Figure 5a shows two columns of broad asymmetric patterns in a diamond sample cut using only a single lens for a varying number of laser pulses. If the focal spot that created these patterns was rastered over an entire diamond it would result in a radiator with large surface variations rendering it unusable for GlueX. The focus of the laser defines the cutting tool with which the diamond is shaped. An ill-defined focused will ablate non-uniformly as the diamond is rastered across it making it extremely difficult to cut uniformly to 20 µm thickness without cracking the thin diamond membrane. The geometry of the focus also determines the fluence (laser energy per cm2 ) incident on the diamond surface. A tightly focused beam spot increases the available fluence, increasing the rate of ablation. It is therefore very important to measure the waist of the beam after L3 in the three lens system.
+
Figure 6 shows two columns of broad asymmetric patterns in a diamond sample cut using only a single lens for a varying number of laser pulses. Figure 7 shows the improvement in beam shape gained after using the three lens setup.
 +
If the focal spot that created these patterns was rastered over an entire diamond it would result in a radiator with large surface variations rendering it unusable for GlueX. The focus of the laser defines the cutting tool with which the diamond is shaped. An ill-defined focused will ablate non-uniformly as the diamond is rastered across it making it extremely difficult to cut uniformly to 20 µm thickness without cracking the thin diamond membrane. The geometry of the focus also determines the fluence (laser energy per cm2 ) incident on the diamond surface. A tightly focused beam spot increases the available fluence, increasing the rate of ablation. It is therefore very important to measure the waist of the beam after L3 in the three lens system.
    
==Focal Spot Characterization==
 
==Focal Spot Characterization==
581

edits

Navigation menu