Work is now underway to implement a more advanced trigger in the Radphi experiment that could work without a fast signal from the recoil proton. With the RPD out of the trigger, it would be possible to completely replace it with a larger acceptance barrel detector. The present discussion is focused on the possibility of adding barrel coverage for both charged particles and neutrals. This would greatly enhance our ability to reject false 5 events that currently feed into our sample from higher multiplicity channels. For example, the decay -> where the decays to 30 appears as a 7 final state, a certain fraction of which will produce two soft photons outside the acceptance of the lead glass wall and improperly reconstruct as a -> 5 event. With the -> decays two orders of magnitude more abundant than the rare decays for which we are searching, we would like to suppress such events as much as possible.
A device with a very similar purpose was built by David Hertzog and collaborators at the University of Illinois for the Jetset experiment at LEAR, which took data between the years 1990-1994. David has indicated that he might allow us the use of this detector for Radphi. It is presently in storage at CERN, and it would be up to us to transport, mount and instrument it with high voltage and whatever else. Since the whole procedure of overseas transport, building a mounting frame, testing and installing it must fit into the narrow time frame of the next few months, it is important that we make a timely decision as to its desirability for our purposes. In this report I describe the geometry and performance of this detector, making liberal use of the figures from the thesis of Johannes Ritter (May 1998). I thank Johannes for making these available.
Johannes shows an overview of the Jetset electromagnetic calorimetry in his Fig. 3.13 shown below.
The basic parameters of the blocks are as follows. The composition by volume is 50% lead alloy, 35% scintillating fibre, and 15% epoxy. The measured density is 4.58g/cm. The radiation length is 1.61cm and the barrel blocks are 9.6cm thick, about 6 radiation lengths.
Being only 6 radiation lengths thick, the energy resolution of the barrel counters is limited by shower leakage out the back of the blocks. Resolution is best for showers of energy around 500MeV and does not follow the E scaling law. It also depends on the incidence angle. Johannes shows the electromagnetic response of a block to 750MeV electrons 22.5o from normal incidence in Fig. 3.14.
The best mechanical drawing I have found so far is Fig. 4.26 from Johannes' thesis. I have reproduced it below. Printing the postscript file of the thesis gives a better rendering than you see on the screen below.